Independent wind resource intelligence

Wind numbers that hold up in bankability review.

MEASNET-aligned WRA, micrositing, EYA, and due diligence for developers, lenders, and investors across the US, EU, and Middle East. Reduce uncertainty, defend P90, and move faster to financial close.

US / EU / MEinternational delivery
MEASNET + IEC 61400methodology stack
P50 / P75 / P90decision outputs

Why this practice exists

Independent by design

No OEM conflict, no developer spin, and no hidden assumptions. Every output is written to survive technical-advisor review.

Decision-ready

The goal is not a longer report. The goal is lower uncertainty, clearer debt cases, and faster decisions.

Global delivery

Time-zone-friendly scoping and remote delivery for cross-border teams in the US, EU, and Middle East.

Core services

Wind resource assessment

Bankable WRA with QC, MCP, flow modelling, uncertainty propagation, and lender-facing outputs.

Energy yield assessment

P50, P75, and P90 cases with uncertainty budgets, spreadsheet output, and review-ready assumptions.

Wind farm due diligence

Independent technical review for finance, acquisition, refinancing, insurance, and repowering.

Who hires this work

The site is written for decision-makers who need wind numbers they can defend, not marketing copy they have to decode.

Developers Lenders Investors EPCs Technical advisors Utility-scale sponsors

Representative engagements

WRAComplex terrainLender review

Complex terrain report, tightened for financing review

Site data, flow modelling, and uncertainty treatment were structured so the lender review path was clear and the assumptions were auditable.

Commercial result: reduced back-and-forth on methodology and a cleaner path to debt sizing.
EYAPortfolio reviewInvestor due diligence

Independent yield review for acquisition diligence

The existing model was tested against the underlying data, loss assumptions, and uncertainty spread before the buyer moved further.

Commercial result: red flags surfaced early enough to affect the decision, not after signing.
QCMet mastPre-WRA

Met mast cleanup before the assessment was commissioned

Data quality, drift, shadow effects, and gap handling were reviewed first so the downstream assessment would not inherit avoidable bias.

Commercial result: cleaner inputs and a lower-risk basis for the next stage of work.
See anonymized case studies

Proof outputs buyers can inspect

High-value wind clients do not buy claims. They look for the working evidence behind the P90, the wake case, the turbine suitability decision, and the lender memo.

How the work is delivered

01

Scope the decision

Project stage, geography, capacity, data availability, deadline, and buyer role are enough to price the work cleanly.

02

Run the technical work

QC, MCP, flow modelling, uncertainty, and review notes are delivered in a format a lender or investor can audit.

03

Defend the result

One revision round, a review call, and a clear decision memo keep the final output usable instead of just descriptive.

Founder authority

Anirudh Sharma is the consulting lead behind Vital Wind Insights. The role of the site is to make that expertise legible without turning the brand into personality-led marketing.

Working style

Scope first, fixed fee second, delivery third. Methodology is visible up front, because decision-makers should see how the numbers are built before they buy them.

Insights worth indexing

Need a wind case that survives review?

Use the contact page to send the project stage, geography, capacity, and deadline. That is enough to start a scoped response and a fixed-fee quote.